>

Few things bring audiences as much joy as the sight of a well-known actor or actress revealing a side of their talent that’s never been seen before. (It’s not just general audiences, either–those roles become instant favorites for Oscar nominations and wins.) It can be as simple as Halle Berry, Julia Roberts or Nicole Kidman deglamorizing themselves for
Monster’s Ball, Erin Brockovich and
The Hours, and as immense as Daniel Day-Lewis’ paralysis in
My Left Foot or Robert DeNiro’s weight gain in
Raging Bull. The most reliable type, though, may be the revelation that a dramatic performer can sing or dance: Amy Adams in
Enchanted, Meryl Streep in
Mamma Mia!, Jeff Bridges in
Crazy Heart, Rene Zellweger in
Chicago… the list goes on. The same is true on Broadway, of course–think Antonio Banderas in
Nine, and practically everyone who’s starred in the revival of
Chicago; Right now, the star with unexpected abilities is Daniel Radcliffe, in the new (and not particularly necessary) revival of Frank Loesser’s
HOW TO SUCCEED IN BUSINESS WITHOUT REALLY TRYING.
Radcliffe is, and probably always will be, known above all for the role that he spent his entire childhood playing, but Harry Potter was never called upon to sing or dance away from evil. As J. Pierrepont Finch, the outrageously ambitious protagonist of the 50-year old musical, Radcliffe has to do both, and while his singing voice is merely decent, the man can dance. Numbers like “Grand Old Ivy” and “The Brotherhood of Man” pretty much bring down the house, in large part because of his footwork.
For those unfamiliar with How to Succeed, the title itself refers to a handbook used by Finch as he rapidly climbs the ranks at Worldwide Wickets, moving from window washer, to the mailroom, to a junior executive office, to the notice of boss J.B. Biggley (John Larroquette), and so forth. Along the way, secretary Rosemary (Rose Hemingway) falls madly in love with him, and he struggles between the pulls of ambition and love, not to mention the competition posed by Biggley’s evil nephew Bud Frump (Christopher J. Hanke). The book by Abe Burrows, Jack Weinstock and Willie Gilbert provides the mildest sort of corporate satire, although it has an off-hand structural skill, effectively conveying the story as needed between Loesser’s songs, that seems impressive today.

Rob Ashford’s production is pleasant enough entertainment–he’s a better fit for this material than he was for last year’s revival of
Promises, Promises, which was more character-and dialogue-based.–and Loesser’s songs are always a pleasure to hear, but there’s nothing revelatory going on at the Hirschfeld Theatre. Ashford seems to have approached the material with the viewpoint that it should be played entirely as it would have been in 1961, with no allowance made or irony taken to acknowledge changes in society since then. So there are no italics around the worship of corporate success, or the sexism the show takes for granted (the song title “Happy To Keep His Dinner Warm” says it all), and no interest in
Mad Men-like commentary about the social revolutions that were just a few years away. Radcliffe’s performance is similarly straightforward, even more so than Robert Morse’s somewhat maniacal one in the original version (at least as preserved in the 1967 film) and Matthew Broderick’s in the 1995 Broadway revival, both of whom took a more cartoonish approach. Given the broad nature of the material, a taste of that might have been a good idea, both for Radcliffe and for Hemingway; the actors who broaden their performances, notably Larroquette, Hanke and Tammy Blanchard as the self-explanatory Hedy LaRue, fare better.
How to Succeed is an enjoyable 2 1/2 hours, brightly choreographed by Ashford and designed by a team that includes Derek McLane (sets), Catherine Zuber (costumes) and Howell Binkley (lighting), supporting a talented, hard-working cast. Is it worth $132 for a standard ticket? Probably not, but discounts are available. And there is a kick in finding out that The Boy Who Lived is also The Actor Who Can Dance.
Related Posts
-
BROADWAY JOURNAL: “Anything Goes”
>Once there was a time when Broadway musicals didn’t have to say anything about society, politics, art, literature, or really much of anything. They were exercises in style, excuses for glamorous people to get up on stage in fancy costumes and sing tuneful, ingenious songs while dancing up a storm. …
-
SHOWBUZZDAILY NY THEATRE JOURNAL: “Other Desert Cities”
>Buzz has it that Jon Robin Baitz’s play OTHER DESERT CITIES is one of the frontrunners for this year’s Best Play Tony Award, and it’s easy to see why. (Let’s leave aside the fact that so few new plays open on Broadway these days, whatever manages to stay open for…
-
SHOWBUZZDAILY NY THEATRE JOURNAL: “Seminar”
>There’s an inescapable irony in Theresa Rebeck’s play SEMINAR when the bilious novelist (Alan Rickman) who’s reluctantly teaching a group of aspiring young writers launches an attack on one of them by predicting that his “whorishness” will make him more suited for a life in Hollywood than one in the…
-
SHOWBUZZDAILY NY THEATRE JOURNAL: “Carrie”
>CARRIE the musical is no longer a joke, and since it’s been a reliable punchline for almost a quarter of a century (a book about Broadway disasters was titled “Not Since Carrie”), that’s quite an accomplishment.Carrie carried a load of baggage before it even opened to a paying Broadway crowd.…
-
SHOWBUZZDAILY BROADWAY JOURNAL: “Follies”
>FOLLIES may be the strangest of all Broadway masterpieces; after 40 years, it’s still the most avant-garde work of Stephen Sondheim’s career.It’s easy enough to make the show sound linear: set in 1971 (which was present-day when the musical was written), it takes place at a theatre that had, for…